We contrast the traditional numeric approach to transparency, which involves auditing and third-party certifications with an alternative approach we call narrative transparency. In this paper we look at how alternative marketing organizations communicate transparency in a climate of generalized risk and skepticism. Clearly, it is of great importance to address the fact that much scientific evidence produced does not translate into policy actions – the problem of ‘little effect’ – and this paper draws up useful ideas for how that challenge can be met. Knowledge brokerage is an under-researched field there is little systematic, practice-oriented research on knowledge brokerage between research and policy-making. The authors contend that the practice of knowledge brokerage could be conceived of as a novel ‘knowledge-articulating institution’ that could potentially re-shape the relationship between scientists and policymakers in order to improve the quality and outcomes of these interactions. an individual, an agency or an organization) that helps facilitate the flow of knowledge from creators to users. Knowledge brokerage might involve a third party (e.g. The authors suggest that there is a need to focus more on what they term ‘knowledge brokerage’, which can be conceived of as a two-way continuous communication process, going beyond the traditional idea of knowledge as something being ‘transferred’ from scientists to policymakers. The reasons for this are manifold – communication, methodology, time constraints, information overload. This paper discusses a highly critical issue, namely the extent to which the knowledge produced by scientists fails to have the expected impact on policy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |